Victimization
As we saw in this week’s readings, the victim was initially “rediscovered” as a possible partner or contributor to the crime committed against them rather than as an individual worthy of sympathy or compassion. For instance, Wolfgang (1952) and Amir (1971) both posited that victims play a role in regard to homicide and forcible rape.
Why do you think the first explorations into victimization in terms of explaining why people are victimized centered not on offender behavior, but on victim behavior?
Does examining victim behavior when attempting to identify the causes of victimization lead to victim-blaming?
Is it wrong to consider the role of the victim? How do we consider the role of the victim in today’s society?
Sample Solution
Prufrock Anti-Hero For some time, the heroes of stories, sonnets, or stories are handily delegated saints or scalawags. Legends are handily distinguished by the qualities he has, for example, fearlessness, genuineness, magnanimity, trust, mental fortitude, authority. Mavericks additionally are anything but difficult to recognize, described by vindictiveness, extortion, corruption, murkiness, wanting to hurt others. In any case, if this character does not have the normal courage, it’s anything but a reprobate. Alfred Prufrock is a wannabe since he saw a lady posing inquiries and he never accomplished his objective. This sonnet centers around the subject of feeling, question, loss of time, and youth. He can not interface with a lady and consistently questions himself and his decision. He dreaded responsibility and uncertainty again and again. He never completely fulfilled his questions; they simply summarize and made more inquiries. He is continually contrasting himself and Hamlet. He asked him whether it was there, and talked about his own decision. Like Proust, Elliot Is your organization? Love Song J. Alfred Prufrock? It assumed an exceptionally separated job. Pulfock is something contrary to the idea of creative mind of exemplary saints, he really typifies a fairly feeble character. His boundary broke his delicate will and he missed all beneficial things throughout his life. This additionally demonstrates a takeoff from typical condition. This is on the grounds that all legends so far are solid, canny, valiant, decent and experienced. Prufrock is right around a wannabe, yet in a way he doesn’t have a lady. What’s more, his dread overpowered him. I saw the snapshot of my huge glimmer/I saw an interminable worker holding me a big stake and I was looking/to put it plainly, would i say i are apprehensive? (84-86) Fear of Prufrock emerges from the feelings of trepidation related with this passing and the dread that he was unable to endure his brave prospects before he kicked the bucket. Unexpectedly, Prufrock saw that he did an inappropriate things throughout his life. (45 to 48) “The Waste Land” and Eliot’s improper wannabe Prufrock remained before the immediate resistance of the “new world’s new green bosom” and the saint of Horatio Alger. Americans who place significance on benefit created “debris of debris” and partitioned eggs of New York City and riches. Industrialization has undermined Thomas Jefferson’s cheerful heaven of land and leaves Fitzgerald’s “a brilliant ranch, debris develops into a peculiar nursery like inspire and slope and wheat”. Ph.D., fake products of commercial signs. This sign was built up by an ophthalmologist “to make his training in Queens more corpulent”, “eyes obscured due to such a large number of unpainted days”, George Wilson, Eckleburg’s The look is to vindicate his dishonest spouse’s killer, his eyes are the eyes of God. The religion of the individuals is endeavoring to bring in cash>
GET ANSWER